Today, in The Columbian, is an article on the indecision concerning the recreational/commercial salmon season on the Columbia. Guides, gearing up for the largest consumer outdoor show in the northwest and the opportunity to fill their days with commerce, are on hold with calendar and pen in hand. Anxious? Yea, I would think so. Will they survive it? Remains to be seen.
When I was young I learned to mooch for salmon on a charter boat called The Chief. The boat's owner was a crusty, stubble specked man named Hans. His vessel was a pile of steel and loose chain railings that begged to unload a passenger on a rolling swell. I loved the smell of the salt water at 5am in Sausalito, the choking diesel exhaust, and the grey hue of the boat we fished from until early afternoon. Each trip was littered with other crusty old guys who deserted their wives for their mistress, the sea, if only temporary. Their names were one word monikers like 'Brinky' and 'Dutch', and their jackets and caps had seen more years than I had at that point. Sour coffee, glazed donuts and an eager flask transitioned to damp deli sandwiches and cans of Old Milwaukie as dawn turned to daylight.
These impressions have been left indefinitely in my memory and were planted there by a 'guide', albeit a crusty one, back in my formative years. I sincerely hope that a youngster, in his formative years, is not prohibited from gaining these experiences due to some posturing by fish boards aiming for control. Let the fish be fished, in moderation of course, and come to a compromise that can let us get back to making memories we can write about 30 years from now.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Decision time for Oregon
http://www.columbian.com/article/20090116/SPORTS04/901169981/-1/SPORTS
It's that time of year when gill net proponents and recreational fisher people butt heads in a classic game of tug-o-war. Personally, I believe our harvest rates for salmon are larger than consumption demand, however, we seem to justify these harvests to sustain a historically important industry or lifestyle. While I am empathetic to those employed in commercial fisheries, I find myself coming to the realization that population growth and an incessant need to contribute to an inflationary economic model do not offer a sustainable (sorry, buzzword had to be used here) solution. It is clear that hatchery science has not solved fish population deficiencies, legislation proves counterproductive at best, and our growing list of conservation groups and agendas seem to dilute each others efforts.
Unfortunately, I do not have a clear answer. It is apparent to me that none of us really have that smoking gun we are bleeding for in this mess as well. So regardless of Oregon's decision to ally itself with WA on this matter we will most likely continue to see this debate years forward.
Do I seem to be confused on this issue? I am. While I hope we can all find concessions that are livable, I know that I might be drinking the Kool-Aid in thinking so.
It's that time of year when gill net proponents and recreational fisher people butt heads in a classic game of tug-o-war. Personally, I believe our harvest rates for salmon are larger than consumption demand, however, we seem to justify these harvests to sustain a historically important industry or lifestyle. While I am empathetic to those employed in commercial fisheries, I find myself coming to the realization that population growth and an incessant need to contribute to an inflationary economic model do not offer a sustainable (sorry, buzzword had to be used here) solution. It is clear that hatchery science has not solved fish population deficiencies, legislation proves counterproductive at best, and our growing list of conservation groups and agendas seem to dilute each others efforts.
Unfortunately, I do not have a clear answer. It is apparent to me that none of us really have that smoking gun we are bleeding for in this mess as well. So regardless of Oregon's decision to ally itself with WA on this matter we will most likely continue to see this debate years forward.
Do I seem to be confused on this issue? I am. While I hope we can all find concessions that are livable, I know that I might be drinking the Kool-Aid in thinking so.
Sunday, January 4, 2009
January Duck Hunt
Chickahook Bay has an old world feel to it. Within the banks of the rivers that converge to form this estuary is a world unto itself. Picture-perfect panoramas collide with weather systems that darken the skies to a grey deluge in a matter of minutes, only to be freed to the sun once again. During the greyest of skies life abounds with a flutter, splash, holler, or flap. Small coastal towns litter the hills above the shoreline separated from the sea by narrow strips of land, dilapidated log and wire fences, and unimproved highways gasping for relief from the harsh weather pounding these areas most days.
These old towns survive from the sea and share a kinship with it most inland folk do not understand. The inhabitants of the estuary are integral pieces of this landscape, and are cherished for their value both physically and spiritually. The bay and it's human occupants that line the shores live in harmony and carry a humble grace amongst themselves. For such a cold, wet physical environment it carries a warm, welcoming embrace.
Our recent trip to Chickahook Bay was in search of waterfowl. For an inexperienced hunter like myself, I was clearly unable to predict what this venture would mean. The day started with the usual early morning rise at 4:30am. I prepared for the day with layers upon layers of 'super wool', 'poly wool', 'warm wool', and every other heat retaining 'wool' garment advertised. I am always cold and I feared today would be a test of my endurance. If there was one thing I was not inexperienced with, it's cold. I love to climb alpine style at high elevation, on snow and ice, but the difference there is that you are constantly moving, driving a warmth through your body. I was cautious that I might underestimate the weather on this excursion so I seemingly thought I over dressed. Not so.
The drive was slow from Salem. Icy roads and an imposing fog kept our travel speed lethargic. We met Greg White, Derek's childhood best-friend, at Fort Hill to consolidate our loads and move forward in Greg's truck, jon boat in tow. A quick stop for a caloric injection of powdered donuts and energy drinks and we were on our way.
We arrived at the dock at 6:30 am. Only one other truck occupied the parking lot. Seems the high water of the last few days had others huddled in their beds, most likely out of respect for the flooding and dangers that could be elevated. The rivers were stable, however, with the Hakeema within its banks and holding true to a hue of milk chocolate. Speeding off into the water with a brisk chill in the air and just a slight wind, we positioned ourselves for the first stop of the day.
Traveling through a bay is ambiguous in many ways. Tidal influences drive water in and out, with subtle landmarks becoming monuments to disappearing altogether. The sliding current plays illusionist to your senses, reminding you that there are bigger forces here. Navigation is a tricky bit, and should not be underestimated. Derek, as experienced as he is, still looks with a questioning eye when piloting his way through this water. Rightfully so, respect should be paid to this entity, as it has taken the lives of the finest of seafarers and fool alike.
Setting decoys is cold work. My hands were numb placing the weights on the thin plastic tubing they call 'tangle free.' True, they did not tangle, unless a weight is on them. Then they're a mess. Best to take the weight off, and, untangle, offer unintelligible profanity, and proceed to start over. By this time your hand is a bit more numb, making it more intolerable. More profanity output and we're done. Derek and Greg waded around positioning the decoys to look like a 'raft' of real feathered fowl and positioned a couple of spinning devices that looked like the above mentioned profanity. Once those were in place, we moved on to our blind.
Now the boat. After placing 60 decoys (which I came to understand wasn't that many) we positioned the boat in such a way that we had a clear view west across the plastic jakes and hens. The boat is camo with a canvas fold-away cover that allows you to 'pop out' when the approaching victims come in to your decoys. This contraption (another profane expletive please) bonked me in the head every time we were set to shoot. I'm a novice, so just getting the motion right of swinging my shotgun to my shoulder, quickly aiming, firing, missing, then pumping and re-aiming, firing, missing again, is enough. I can't say I needed the extra obstacle of wrapping my head in canvas before the shot. Some redesign will be done. I will make sure of that...
The day was slow I was told. By 10 am we had only had about 2 opportunities. Neither successful. Theories ranged from the abundance of water in town to the inadequacy of steel shot. Stories, and lots of laughter, ensued during the oft idle time under the canvas. With fowl avoiding us like, well, fowl avoiding hunters, the views captivated me throughout the day. I had left my camera back home because I had misplaced my dry bag, so all the stunning displays this day were to be filed in the hard drive in my head, hopefully not getting lost among the marbles and spinning contraptions contained within two ears. I can clearly picture the scene when the sunlight found a chance to illuminate a decoy, stretching itself across the water and tactically placing shadows to increase the drama of the photo. Stunning.
Frustration was evident among my more seasoned companions. According to legend, this slow day was getting slower. Even the lab, Kaman, was bored. He resorted to licking himself at a decibel level that made us uncomfortable at times, and we assigned him the lonely corner of the boat where he might consider his acts more prudently. A few opportunities arrived when Buffleheads swung through and I was instructed to take them down with my keen shot. I realized quickly that these were the least desirable of the lot, thus they were offered to me. I obliged and went for 'em, bringing a few down with a blast. Kaman finally had work, albeit little to speak of, but some none the less.
4:20pm. Things picked up. A squadron of geese approached and settled just beyond our reach. Some widgeon descended upon the decoys and shots were fired but none taken. Seems we were positioned just beyond range for steel shot making Derek and Greg a bit grumpy. The last 25 minutes of the hunt were the most active overall. What was so impressive here was watching Derek call into a settling group of ducks and rooting them up and over to us. This was finally what it should be, more action, more intrigue, and definitely a sense of excitement. As quickly as it came, it soon vacated and left us collecting decoys in the rapidly approaching nightfall. Scurrying in the deepening tide, Greg pulled one raft and Derek the other, while I packed the decoys in their mesh sacks for the trip to the dock. We secured, or thought we did, the load and motored for the take-out. About a quarter mile into our journey back I was uprooted from my seat and watched our anchor launch itself out of the boat towards the prop. We quickly yelled to Derek to cut throttle and avoided what could have been a serious disaster.
Upon returning home, I realized why duck hunting is such a desirable sport, even though it offers such undesirable accommodations. I came to respect this type of hunt very quickly, both for the sport and strategy employed. The scenery, the camaraderie, and the experience of it all combined has made me wanting more, soon. And with only two weeks left in the season, I'll be scrambling to make time to experience this once again.
These old towns survive from the sea and share a kinship with it most inland folk do not understand. The inhabitants of the estuary are integral pieces of this landscape, and are cherished for their value both physically and spiritually. The bay and it's human occupants that line the shores live in harmony and carry a humble grace amongst themselves. For such a cold, wet physical environment it carries a warm, welcoming embrace.
Our recent trip to Chickahook Bay was in search of waterfowl. For an inexperienced hunter like myself, I was clearly unable to predict what this venture would mean. The day started with the usual early morning rise at 4:30am. I prepared for the day with layers upon layers of 'super wool', 'poly wool', 'warm wool', and every other heat retaining 'wool' garment advertised. I am always cold and I feared today would be a test of my endurance. If there was one thing I was not inexperienced with, it's cold. I love to climb alpine style at high elevation, on snow and ice, but the difference there is that you are constantly moving, driving a warmth through your body. I was cautious that I might underestimate the weather on this excursion so I seemingly thought I over dressed. Not so.
The drive was slow from Salem. Icy roads and an imposing fog kept our travel speed lethargic. We met Greg White, Derek's childhood best-friend, at Fort Hill to consolidate our loads and move forward in Greg's truck, jon boat in tow. A quick stop for a caloric injection of powdered donuts and energy drinks and we were on our way.
We arrived at the dock at 6:30 am. Only one other truck occupied the parking lot. Seems the high water of the last few days had others huddled in their beds, most likely out of respect for the flooding and dangers that could be elevated. The rivers were stable, however, with the Hakeema within its banks and holding true to a hue of milk chocolate. Speeding off into the water with a brisk chill in the air and just a slight wind, we positioned ourselves for the first stop of the day.
Traveling through a bay is ambiguous in many ways. Tidal influences drive water in and out, with subtle landmarks becoming monuments to disappearing altogether. The sliding current plays illusionist to your senses, reminding you that there are bigger forces here. Navigation is a tricky bit, and should not be underestimated. Derek, as experienced as he is, still looks with a questioning eye when piloting his way through this water. Rightfully so, respect should be paid to this entity, as it has taken the lives of the finest of seafarers and fool alike.
Setting decoys is cold work. My hands were numb placing the weights on the thin plastic tubing they call 'tangle free.' True, they did not tangle, unless a weight is on them. Then they're a mess. Best to take the weight off, and, untangle, offer unintelligible profanity, and proceed to start over. By this time your hand is a bit more numb, making it more intolerable. More profanity output and we're done. Derek and Greg waded around positioning the decoys to look like a 'raft' of real feathered fowl and positioned a couple of spinning devices that looked like the above mentioned profanity. Once those were in place, we moved on to our blind.
Now the boat. After placing 60 decoys (which I came to understand wasn't that many) we positioned the boat in such a way that we had a clear view west across the plastic jakes and hens. The boat is camo with a canvas fold-away cover that allows you to 'pop out' when the approaching victims come in to your decoys. This contraption (another profane expletive please) bonked me in the head every time we were set to shoot. I'm a novice, so just getting the motion right of swinging my shotgun to my shoulder, quickly aiming, firing, missing, then pumping and re-aiming, firing, missing again, is enough. I can't say I needed the extra obstacle of wrapping my head in canvas before the shot. Some redesign will be done. I will make sure of that...
The day was slow I was told. By 10 am we had only had about 2 opportunities. Neither successful. Theories ranged from the abundance of water in town to the inadequacy of steel shot. Stories, and lots of laughter, ensued during the oft idle time under the canvas. With fowl avoiding us like, well, fowl avoiding hunters, the views captivated me throughout the day. I had left my camera back home because I had misplaced my dry bag, so all the stunning displays this day were to be filed in the hard drive in my head, hopefully not getting lost among the marbles and spinning contraptions contained within two ears. I can clearly picture the scene when the sunlight found a chance to illuminate a decoy, stretching itself across the water and tactically placing shadows to increase the drama of the photo. Stunning.
Frustration was evident among my more seasoned companions. According to legend, this slow day was getting slower. Even the lab, Kaman, was bored. He resorted to licking himself at a decibel level that made us uncomfortable at times, and we assigned him the lonely corner of the boat where he might consider his acts more prudently. A few opportunities arrived when Buffleheads swung through and I was instructed to take them down with my keen shot. I realized quickly that these were the least desirable of the lot, thus they were offered to me. I obliged and went for 'em, bringing a few down with a blast. Kaman finally had work, albeit little to speak of, but some none the less.
4:20pm. Things picked up. A squadron of geese approached and settled just beyond our reach. Some widgeon descended upon the decoys and shots were fired but none taken. Seems we were positioned just beyond range for steel shot making Derek and Greg a bit grumpy. The last 25 minutes of the hunt were the most active overall. What was so impressive here was watching Derek call into a settling group of ducks and rooting them up and over to us. This was finally what it should be, more action, more intrigue, and definitely a sense of excitement. As quickly as it came, it soon vacated and left us collecting decoys in the rapidly approaching nightfall. Scurrying in the deepening tide, Greg pulled one raft and Derek the other, while I packed the decoys in their mesh sacks for the trip to the dock. We secured, or thought we did, the load and motored for the take-out. About a quarter mile into our journey back I was uprooted from my seat and watched our anchor launch itself out of the boat towards the prop. We quickly yelled to Derek to cut throttle and avoided what could have been a serious disaster.
Upon returning home, I realized why duck hunting is such a desirable sport, even though it offers such undesirable accommodations. I came to respect this type of hunt very quickly, both for the sport and strategy employed. The scenery, the camaraderie, and the experience of it all combined has made me wanting more, soon. And with only two weeks left in the season, I'll be scrambling to make time to experience this once again.
Thursday, January 1, 2009
New Years Play
Last night may have been the first New Years in a few that I have actually made the 12am celebratory leap. Today I am alert, cognizant, and enthusiastic about the day's events. Bringing in 2009 consists of a hike with my son, travel to a museum in The Dalles, and some wildlife viewing along the way. Perhaps even some product testing...
I make no resolutions, other than to commit myself to my established physical workouts, increase my involvement in conservation efforts, be a better father and husband, etc. Get an MBA. Build a rocket. You know, normal stuff.
What I am to resolve, however, is that I encourage at least 1 youth each week to explore the outdoors and get connected to our natural world.
Wishing everyone a Happy New Year...
I make no resolutions, other than to commit myself to my established physical workouts, increase my involvement in conservation efforts, be a better father and husband, etc. Get an MBA. Build a rocket. You know, normal stuff.
What I am to resolve, however, is that I encourage at least 1 youth each week to explore the outdoors and get connected to our natural world.
Wishing everyone a Happy New Year...
Sunday, December 28, 2008
My Dog & Me
It's late December. I should be thinking about winter steelhead more than I am. Instead I am thinking about my dog.
Yep, my dog. A mix-breed mutt somewhere between Australian Shepherd and Border Collie. He's skittish at best, often misunderstood, and always a caution around young kids. His hair is stringy in places and smooth as silk in others. He runs fast. Real fast. Like 'I got diarrhea and need to find a potty' fast. He fetches well, but doesn't always take a command the way we envisioned him to. He ignores other dogs and follows me everywhere. He leaps at me when it's time for a walk and he never pees in the house. Mostly he's a great companion.
Saturday night found the wife and I taking the kids to the movies to see Marley & Me. I had no idea what this flick was about, I only knew it had a PG rating and Jennifer Aniston starring. Good enough, let's roll! It started out cute enough, a story about a boy and his dog. Soon it got to the relationship between the characters, but always returned to the the dog Marley and how he was a constant throughout their lives they could both relate special memories to. Marley is a fixture in their home, through moves across country, kids growing up, a stabbing next door, etc, and all the way the dog has a definitive relationship with each character. While the story is a bit mushy at times and somewhat convenient, it made me examine our dog (Chance) and how special he has become to our family. He's a constant for us, a special companion to each of us in our own way, and the one personality in our home that never judges, seems to be happy all the time, and for the most part is the lowest maintenance of all. I could stand to learn a lot from this dog. I could stand to be more joyful, less maintenance heavy, and be a better companion to all the others in the house. I am sure my wife will agree with that.
Peculiarly, I left the cinema with - get this - a tear in my eye. Grown men do cry, at least this one does, especially when it comes to a beloved hound. I won't give up the story, but let's just say that it swayed my thoughts from the river to Rover. I figured most sporting types out there could relate. Perhaps not with seeing Marley & Me, but at least relate to the special kinship we share with our canines.
I am going fishing this weekend. And I am taking the dog...
Yep, my dog. A mix-breed mutt somewhere between Australian Shepherd and Border Collie. He's skittish at best, often misunderstood, and always a caution around young kids. His hair is stringy in places and smooth as silk in others. He runs fast. Real fast. Like 'I got diarrhea and need to find a potty' fast. He fetches well, but doesn't always take a command the way we envisioned him to. He ignores other dogs and follows me everywhere. He leaps at me when it's time for a walk and he never pees in the house. Mostly he's a great companion.
Saturday night found the wife and I taking the kids to the movies to see Marley & Me. I had no idea what this flick was about, I only knew it had a PG rating and Jennifer Aniston starring. Good enough, let's roll! It started out cute enough, a story about a boy and his dog. Soon it got to the relationship between the characters, but always returned to the the dog Marley and how he was a constant throughout their lives they could both relate special memories to. Marley is a fixture in their home, through moves across country, kids growing up, a stabbing next door, etc, and all the way the dog has a definitive relationship with each character. While the story is a bit mushy at times and somewhat convenient, it made me examine our dog (Chance) and how special he has become to our family. He's a constant for us, a special companion to each of us in our own way, and the one personality in our home that never judges, seems to be happy all the time, and for the most part is the lowest maintenance of all. I could stand to learn a lot from this dog. I could stand to be more joyful, less maintenance heavy, and be a better companion to all the others in the house. I am sure my wife will agree with that.
Peculiarly, I left the cinema with - get this - a tear in my eye. Grown men do cry, at least this one does, especially when it comes to a beloved hound. I won't give up the story, but let's just say that it swayed my thoughts from the river to Rover. I figured most sporting types out there could relate. Perhaps not with seeing Marley & Me, but at least relate to the special kinship we share with our canines.
I am going fishing this weekend. And I am taking the dog...
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Fish Projections Icy At Best
We are all hunkered down right now, waiting out the ice and snow accumulation that is keeping us off the roads. On Friday I was hopeful the weather would be manageable and I could pursue some fish on the local haunt. It was not to be. I am at home with the family (equally enjoyable most days!) throwing snowballs at the dog.
A parallel storyline is playing out in SW Washington. The most recent fish projection for the spring runs on the Cowlitz, Lewis, & Kalama falls well short of our hopes. Every year I have hope that the counts will surpass the previous year, and seemingly every year we are delivered coal in our stocking. Now this is not to say that projections meet actual, or the science is always wrong, etc. It is only the observation that we look to science to give us a concrete, definitive answer that in no way can be definitive or concrete. We will anxiously await this declaration of uncertainty and then either a. complain about fisheries science and global climate change, or b. revel in a 2 fish day that wasn't supposed to happen. Or, the reality of these reports is that they can destroy our expectations if they force a closure of the fishery.
Here's the damage report:
http://www.columbian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/SPORTS
The conclusion here is that rarely do results meet expectations. Being snowed in kept me from fishing this weekend, but a report on fishery health can either heighten, or exterminate, any expectation.
http://www.columbian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/SPORTS
A parallel storyline is playing out in SW Washington. The most recent fish projection for the spring runs on the Cowlitz, Lewis, & Kalama falls well short of our hopes. Every year I have hope that the counts will surpass the previous year, and seemingly every year we are delivered coal in our stocking. Now this is not to say that projections meet actual, or the science is always wrong, etc. It is only the observation that we look to science to give us a concrete, definitive answer that in no way can be definitive or concrete. We will anxiously await this declaration of uncertainty and then either a. complain about fisheries science and global climate change, or b. revel in a 2 fish day that wasn't supposed to happen. Or, the reality of these reports is that they can destroy our expectations if they force a closure of the fishery.
Here's the damage report:
http://www.columbian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/SPORTS
The conclusion here is that rarely do results meet expectations. Being snowed in kept me from fishing this weekend, but a report on fishery health can either heighten, or exterminate, any expectation.
http://www.columbian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081217/SPORTS
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Trout Wars in California
I'll get plenty of crap for admitting this, but I am a transplant from the bay area who just completed his 8th year here. I tend to go back to trusty, reliable sources from the BA on occasion to read about the old haunt and what is going on. The following link is to an article in the SF Chronicle by Tom Stienstra, a well-respected journalist and naturalist from the BA. While I might not agree with everything this man says, he is a wise person and of sound intellect, and most interstingly, he is a practicing sportsman. Read the following article and decide for yourself if something seems wrong in this decision. Most of the lakes in question are man made and a host of far more aggressive introduced species (bass, bluegill, etc.) are resident there as well. The unfortunate play here is that DFG in CA cannot afford to litigate this battle. Pretty soon they'll be penniless and completely ineffective at managing special interests like this from running the 'outdoors' according to their plan and theirs alone. What is startling here (or not) is that the directive from this organization is keenly aware of the DFG financial position.
Groups like this do plenty of good work. Groups like this also tend to take your taxpayer money to court rather than allowing it to work within itself and find reasonable, accountable initiatives. If DFG could use this money on actually improving and restoring habitat, rather than paying for a legal mouthpiece, we all might come to a compromise and be better off. I am rarely against an organization for attempting to better a situation, however, a targeted campaign in this manner does less for their credibility than it does for their integrity.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/11/SPUJ14K8B0.DTL
Contact Noah Greenwald at:
503.484.7495, ngreenwald@biologicaldiversity.org
Groups like this do plenty of good work. Groups like this also tend to take your taxpayer money to court rather than allowing it to work within itself and find reasonable, accountable initiatives. If DFG could use this money on actually improving and restoring habitat, rather than paying for a legal mouthpiece, we all might come to a compromise and be better off. I am rarely against an organization for attempting to better a situation, however, a targeted campaign in this manner does less for their credibility than it does for their integrity.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/11/SPUJ14K8B0.DTL
Contact Noah Greenwald at:
503.484.7495, ngreenwald@biologicaldiversity.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
